User description

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.Rental vs. Construction.Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. Because of this the use of web hard is becoming common.But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. 웹하드순위 Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.